The saga is now completed

After collecting for almost 5 months, I finally got 2 of the pieces that I have been looking for. For the time being, the Avenger is completed. Cool

艾未未怕誰？

Finally, the freedom fighter was released. It does astonished me that he has remain silence after being set free, I suppose as someone of his status and virtue, he should have shown the mass how "unethical" and "Injustice" the government has been treating him neglecting the fact that he might be arrested immediately again. So when asking who is scared of him, should we also ask who has scared him?

小雞Semester 1既成積

返學日數：1日
溫習日數：小於7日
所讀科目：2
GPA：3 （1 A- 1C+)
一如所料，Liberation Theology得個C+, 睇來用我自己唔熟既寫法去寫野感覺實在係差D，反而另一科拿A-，如果以前既我可能會好想知點解唔係拿A。今時今日，只可以講：用2日寫，睇左0本參孝書拿到個A-, 重可以想要D咩？ 反而而家想問，如果我跟返呢個進程去寫Dissertation唔知得唔得啦？ 之前EMAIL左Dr. Yip，不過佢重未回，可以點？

大件事。。病左

又發燒啦。。。呢期去GYM好似沒晒力咁。。。唔通年記大左。。。力不從心！！！！

電視逼你轉睇Blue-Ray

以前想係32寸睇VCD就起格，諗唔到原來用屋企部52寸睇DVD都開始起小格，睇來60寸以上既你都唔使諗用DVD。

咁而家曾特首有沒言論自由先？

Recently, some of the columns and reviews in the SCMP have indicated that the speech of Mr. Tsang last week "is" fallible or even despicable because his speech “is” an order to the local judiciary system. As anyone who barely knows contemporary hermeneutics has to conclude that, the same piece of text can be interpret very differently even by identical triplets; not to mention when it was “decoded” by the Pan Democratic Parties that have never asserted anything the government has been doing. It is not very surprising that they have to make a statement today, claiming Mr. Tsang has, once again, made a personal, public, political, administrative and ….  mistake.

Frankly, I just care very little about the debate between whether the stability  of the judiciary system and the development of Hong Kong should be preserved and so on, what I would like to question is, “Does Mr. Tsang enjoy freedom of speeches like everyone does?” Defining the term with common sense, freedom of speech is a self-evidence property that everybody was born with the right to speak freely. So here, if anybody say you “cannot” say something, it simply means that you do not have the freedom to say certain things at certain place and certain time, just for instance people have suggested that because of Ai WeiWei's political speech, he was caught by mainland government and it is a typical case showing that Ai WeiWei has been deprived of making speeches freely.

According to the Pan Democratic Parties, they have protested against Tsang’s comment today, claiming his statement was meant to pressure the court to favor the government; consequently, the speech should not have been made. Firstly, base on the news, Tsang just claimed that there had been a trend in Hong Kong believing that some politicians had been misusing and hijacking the judiciary system for their political means. If we read his comment once again, I cannot see a problem in concluding that Tsang has just stated a fact. For sure, one can say his speech implied a message to the court; nevertheless, since we love to play with the judiciary concepts, isn’t Tsang  “Innocent before proven guilty”? Thus, it is the burden of Pan Democratic Party to prove that other than stating a fact, Tsang was in fact guilty of planning to devastate and manipulate the judiciary system in Hong Kong. I personally am not sure whether anybody from the parties is going to step out to prove the sinfulness of Tsang, it is because, to the them, they have already passed filming the court scene, it is already time to sentence him to death.

Secondly, as I have been suggesting since the very beginning, Tsang, like every of us should be benefit from having the freedom to speak; however, base on the press conference from the parties, I believe Tsang is most likely an alien from Area 51. I remember I had read a book when I was a secondary school student, named Animal Farm, it says something about class struggle resulting that some are enjoying more  from the rest; nowadays, it seems like our system is indicating some are enjoying less from the rest.

I sympathy Tsang and I could not help but wonder, “On what grounds did Tsang is not allowed to make such a speech?” In this case, Tsang has just stated a fact and it has been the Pan Democratic Parties, who interpret Tsang’s speech as a sign in controlling the court, which they lack arguments for validations. Secondly, even if Tsang did mean to say something about the court's ruling, he has the right to do that, it might not be appropriate but still it is the right God has given him. Maybe one might want to say, if Tsang really meant to set directions for the court, he has already broken the basic law. In that case, besides saying Tsang is wicked, it also suggests that we cannot take the concept of freedom of speech as granted, when we use the term we have to stress the boundaries of it rather than using them universally and univocally, like most the parties have been using. So once again, it is a double standard, some are enjoying less because those are working for the HKSAR government.

嘩！原來費格遜咁堅既。

今日睇GOAL.COM先知在費格遜執教的24年當中，一共幫助曼聯奪取了12座聯賽冠軍，也使得曼聯的聯賽奪冠次數由7個增加到目前的19個，一舉超越了曾經的英格蘭霸主紅軍利物浦。


咁即係2年拿一次。Orz

開心既一日，個櫃來左啦！Sideshow DareDevil快D來啦！！！！

等左咁耐，終於等到個櫃來啦，比我想像中靚好多，今日搞完之後就要開始放D野上去。我諗我應該1：4會放係富窗台而1：5同1：1 Bust 就放係櫃同牆板上面。而家期待過多幾日會到既SS DD， 希望同Thanos同Punisher會夾到啦。

係啦，你地岩我錯囉！

如果1個月前，我同朋大講係有機會既情況我沒賣到我手上既股票，10個有11個會話我係天真雞，D錢夠正常人用一世你都唔賣，有沒人咁笨既。到今日，10個有12個朋友會同我講，如果而家人地同你回購返手上既股票，你打死都唔好賣除非真係好好價。

對呢D講法，我自問真係笑左，係呢一年我學到既係，神要我係沒有安全感中在他身上找到安全感。我自己對樂觀既事返而悲觀，悲觀既事返而樂觀。用返一種反事實既睇法，如果我當時賣晒，唔單單係我今日可能後悔因為原來D股票係更加值錢，我好大可能唔會係今日既我。當時拿住D錢，我想我會日日去玩，點會入中大，又點會去呀關個度做野，又點會出去幫人補習？ 今時今日，我沒人地賣左個D咁好還境，但係最小我搵到自己既價值，做人既目標。

好啦，今日當大家都睇好佢地會用高價回收我地末賣既股票，我反而想問，人地點解要益你？人地D錢打劫返來既？ 你又唔係佢邊個。我呢D都係等比人WRITE OFF既啦。

我係美國所以我入你屋企殺我唔鐘意既人就係正義。

我都想好似美國咁！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！

1.5億呀！！！！！！！

1.5億呀！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！

可悲既潮人

有時係街見到D所謂潮人，我心入而不禁就想講句呢堆人真係可悲。大部份既人，係我既認知入面都覺得潮係一個ICON，一個PRESTIGE。我想問既係：如果潮只係一種ARTIFICIAL VALUE 由第三者加係一個人身上，潮有咩咁 PRESTIGE？

The problem is obvious, to most people being hip is a property that makes someone unique. However, not only do they not realize that they have been encroached by the fashion ideologies unconsciously, they also fail to recognize that rather than being proud of who they are, they should have been ashamed of how they have been. It is without a dispute that most people fail to see my point of view. (It is not a straw man but a general fact.)

The argument is pretty simple, when someone thinks he is cool and in, he has to follow the value defined by fashion. (Hold that as an univocal idea) However, since there is no intrinsic value of being fashionable as it is not a secret that fashion changes every moment. So today you are in, tomorrow you are out. (Quoting a slogan from Project Runway) Put things otherwise, the validation of being hip is entirely determined by the trend, one is just a dot in the flux, who is so lack of power and vivid. 

Can a puppet who dressed decently by the master proud of being pretty? If it is a no, the logics go with those people. I say they are pathetic because after all the money they have spent, all the hours they have used on fashion, at best they are just a beautiful doll. It is just sad and pathetic.

人就係咁沒咁大個頭就係要帶咁大頂帽

有時真係唔係好明有D人點解要咁樣，本身屋企唔係有錢又要把到個頭大一大，帶G﹣SHOCK唔好咩？人帶RO，你又要帶RO，人有HERMES，你又要HERMES。咁多人死又唔見佢地死？

平反六四，平你條毛。

點解要平反六四？自問係一個唔識政治既人，不過就係睇唔過眼D泛淫年年都話要平反，最死係又有一堆自以為好LIBERAL既人又跟住要求平反。講真，我真係唔明要平反D咩。平反即係有野錯啦，咁係當日六四中國政府應該“人道”D咁KO佢地定係當時既中國政府應該下台？ 我就話唯一要平反既就係六四既鎮壓應該有一個正面既評價，而家中國可以一路順利發展，就係因為當日正義既一步。

There are too many ignorances who believe they have been illuminated. It is really pathetic that, those who get encroached by the mass media has no sense of how they have been manipulating by the media. They feel like they have been acting freely, standing by the virtue of justice and fighting the evil HKSAR government with the sword of liberation. However, in fact, they are just puppets being determined by the vague ideologies like democracy, freedom and so on and so forth. 

As a scholar who stand at the back of social issues, I cannot help but feel despair. You can teach those willing to learn, you can enlighten those who are less educated, but you can never ever discuss how fallible a self-righteous person has been. Logically speaking, what makes me different from them? Well, after everything I have said, including whether we should liberate 4/6 or setting free Ai WeiWei, I welcome counter arguments. As Plato has suggested, we should follow arguments where ever they lead.

There is nothing wrong to be an ignorance, we all born a blank paper, it is sinful if you are both ignorant and arrogant. 

反對中國政府釋放艾未未！

我想問如果我咁講，得唔得先？如果唔得，點解唔得？ 講真，放，唔放，我沒跟開發生咩事，我亦唔係一個政客，正如成龍哥哥講，我得小六程度識D咩。我關心既係當一個人高舉人權，平等呢D所謂自證既CONCEPT時，其實有沒人去定義一下呢D野係咩來？如果呢堆野只係一堆口號去理性化一個人既喜好，咁呢堆野同把一把尚方寶劍比左個鐘意玩GTA既人有咩分別？

Sideshow Toys Wish List

These are the items that I have been looking for

1. Thor PF Ex 

2. Yoda and Clone Trooper PF

3. Punisher Com EX

4. Spiderman Com EX

These are the items that I have pre-ordered

1. HT Indiana Jones 

2. HT Iron Man MK VI

3. HT Iron Man MK V

4. HT Thor

5. SS War Machine 1:1 bust

6. SS Clone Trooper 501 1:1 bust

7. SS Daredevil Com EX

8. SS Angel Com EX

9. SS The Beast Com EX

10. SS Captain America PF Reg

11. SS Rogue PF Reg

有時真係唔係好明神

神學來講，你唔明佢係好正常既，唔好講神啦，就算係你最好既朋友，你有時都不禁會返問自己點解佢會咁既？ 係呢一個月，再一次數算神既恩典，佢既恩典係實實在在咁夠我用，但係正如我一路講，神真係好得意，當我想作下主既時間，佢好似就唔比。之前搵個幾份補習，真係超順利，之後貪心想補多1份（1份咁大把！！），搵左幾個星期都沒岩我心水。之後開始信心不足，唔知前路可以點。唔明真係唔明！！！

5個人有一個有精神病？

咩個RATIO咁既咩？係我身邊好似個個都有咁既！係呀講緊你地呀！！！！！！！！

呀你副修D咩呀？

今日見到一段AD

本人現主修大學英文系一年級, 副修法文，西班牙文，語言，翻譯，社會研究和英國文學。 

小弟真係見識小，大學可以副修咁多野既咩？ 

想自己開鋪

今日係度諗，如果小雞有一日唔再做RESEARCH，唔讀書，開鋪做老闆得唔得啦？如果想賣美玩，都係3間，SS， HT同BOWEN，拿到幾多DISCOUNT賣幾多。當租加雜費1萬5千，我要賣幾多隻？如果雜費1萬又如何？而家對我來講做補習其實係開心既，因為我感覺人家比錢我，我分享我讀書同人生既經驗。但假如有一日，錢唔再係一個問題而我又仲鐘意買美玩，拿30﹣40萬出來做生意，我覺得唔過份。不過都係個句，看神如何帶領啦。